Monthly Archives: April 2007

Stumbling Around - Waste More Time, Become a Genius

0
Filed under Sci/Tech

In 1987 RS Wurman examined the amount of information available in an average edition of the New York Times. In his book, Information Anxiety, he discussed how if you were to read the NYT from cover-to-cover on a weekday, you’ll encounter more information than the average person did in their lifetime 300 years ago.

10 years later, in 1997, Reuters Magazine printed an article entitled ‘Information Overload Causes Stress’ discussing the proliferation of new information in our society. In it, researchers concluded that “in the last 30 years mankind has produced more information than in the previous 5,000″.

That was 10 years ago, and today the New York Times has predicted that we will soon produce information at such a rate that it will exceed our capacity to store it and that more books and articles are published in a single day than one person could read in their lifetime. It seems that the 21st Century is the age of Information Overload.

You’ve undoubtedly already heard the phrase ‘Information Overload’ - it’s one that has been coined to describe the overwhelming amount of data becoming available to a person, which in turn means there is too much information available to make a fully informed decision or to remain informed about a topic. This is especially potent in the computing field, where technology advances at such a pace that to not keep abreast of new technologies is to fall by the wayside. The problem we are faced with isn’t in trying to find a way to stem the flow of information; it’s in finding new ways to absorb it.

As our reliance on technology increases, we’re becoming lazy learners. People are not willing to learn on themselves, and feel that technology should come up with a solution for this ‘overload’. And it does. With the ‘invention’ of XML and RSS feeds, we can ’subscribe’ to a number of sites, scraping the content from them and producing them in an easy to read format in a ‘feed reader’, such as Google Reader. This improves the signal-to-noise ratio by removing unwanted graphics, links, and even design from websites where all we want is the content. This signal-to-noise ratio has again been improved upon by ‘Yahoo! Pipes‘ where these RSS feeds are aggregated, and you give the reader a set of rules to display only content that is relevant to your criteria, removing unwanted posts and creating a single post from many!

Entrepreneurs are constantly coming up with ways to limit the impact of Information Overload by reducing the amount of information we come into contact with, and I believe this is the wrong way to go about things. We should stop relying on technology to ‘learn for us’ and should instead just concentrate on the information that is relevant, rather than the information that is, well, pointless. But herein lies the predicament: without technological advances, how can we find this relevant information?

With this, I want to introduce you to StubleUpon - a new ‘web app’ that has been developed to do just this: it sifts the wheat from the chaff, the signal from the noise, and presents us with pure, unadulterated Internet goodness - websites we’re going to like that we’ve never heard of and would never have normally visited.

For those of you not using StumbleUpon, I assume you’ve either not heard of it before or are just sceptical about another highly lauded, so-called ‘killer app’. After all, these things come and go every day and only a few of the best stick. Ever the cynic, this past week has seen me eventually give StumbleUpon the time of day, and I’m very impressed. This is going to stick.

The ‘app’ takes the form of a toolbar that you add to your web browser of choice and then use to rate websites you visit with a simple thumbs up or thumbs down button. StumbleUpon then builds a ‘profile’ of your browsing habits and compares it to other users’ profiles. Simply clicking on the ‘Stumble’ button will then take you to a random website that others with similar tastes to your own have visited and rated. The longer you use it, the better your profile becomes, and thus the sites you are sent to are increasingly relevant to your personal tastes.

StumbleUpon is something that helps the Information Overload in exactly the way I discussed above. Instead of reducing the amount of information we are presented with, it does the opposite - it increases the amount of information we encounter, but ensures it is relevant. Within days of using StumbleUpon, my profile’s ’success rate’ is impressive, and in turn my bookmarks and RSS subscriptions have increased dramatically… and I’m wasting more time on websites I love!

Extreme Christian Philosophy: Kicking Ass, Jesus Style!

2
Filed under Everything Else

No, no, it’s not Mel Gibson’s new movie, it’s just that once again a swift reply from Carl astounds me in its coherence and insight, and after a busy weekend I can reply… and this is it. I decided to make this a new post though as Carl’s original comment and this reply have some good ideas in it that I think would be interesting.

Apologies again for a post on religion. If the previous post bored you, just skip this one - however, there are some good philosophical points you may find interesting.
If you are going to continue, it’ll be worthwhile reading Carl’s comment first.

The Don Imus account and the question on how one should react to it brings to mind a quote I heard a long time ago. It was by Morgan Freeman on ‘60 Minutes’, and he said that “the only way to stop racism is to stop talking about”. Obviously not to be taken literally, to me this is more of a MLK stance towards racism, but instead of taking the route of non-violence you apply it verbally in a non-reactionary way. To not react verbally can imply complacency, whereas lashing out and countering claims can make people -as you say - unknowingly complicit. It can too, just simply weaken their stance of being a ‘freedom fighter’ as it suggests hypocrisy. However, being accused of acceptance through inaction is surely better than hindering your ’cause’, whether it gives you further grief or not?

It’s like the old adage usually applied to children: if a child misbehaves or says something ‘wrong’ and is scolded for it, this reaction can bring an onlooker to say “Don’t encourage him” or “Ignore her and she’ll stop”. But then, if the child was to later repeat this behaviour in front of another person (who didn’t hear this previous exchange), they could likely say “So, you think that’s acceptable behaviour do you?” - damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

The problem is though, if one goes through life blindly accepting a certain traditional viewpoint (everything from social and class attitudes, moral standpoints and religious views) rather than questioning them, surely that is being truly closed-minded? Closed-minded by not accepting that your interpretation of the ‘truth’ may be wrong. Take Carl’s example of a provocateur saying “humans are animals” and then being accused of being closed-minded and of spewing hate speech from the conservative, religious masses. Surely this reaction itself could then be construed as hate speech and naivety from a Buddhist’s standpoint, where humans can be reborn as animals?

To answer the second question raised first, as to how I will draw a line between hate speech and inquiry, it’s simple: I don’t plan to. To do so would be closed-minded in itself, in my opinion. If confronted I can explain my views on a certain topic from a religious or moral viewpoint, otherwise I shall happily get on with my life. (Carl, is this what you meant? Am I making sense, or did I misinterpret this?)
In reply to the first question however; no, I do not think I need a religion to dictate my values for me, and have actually now started to make a conscious effort not to do so. Instead I’m adapting my religion to integrate my own beliefs into it rather than denouncing it entirely just because my views are not ‘classically accepted’.

I don’t think this is unusual - religion has always had an ‘adapt to survive’ mentality. Look at how, with advances in physics and astronomy, the ancient view of a physical God controlling the world from the clouds changed to become the current accepted view where there is a God ‘out there’ somewhere in a more non-physical manner; consider Galileo who was imprisoned by the church for his heliocentric views (that the earth rotates around the sun), and even more recently; look at how Catholicism has renounced limbo just this very week - after 800 years of believing it.

As a liberal Christian with a philosophy leaning towards a mix of non-theism, agnosticism and existentialism, I’ve taken a lot from John Spong (what an awesome name), John Robinson and Paul Tillich. Evangelicals and other conservative Christians believe that these theologians and philosophers were heretics preaching extreme, controversial theological views. I believe them to be some of the most intelligent and important religious philosophers in history, of whose ideas I take great influence from.  Again, it’s say what you believe and be damned, or say nothing and deny who you are.

Being a Child Again: An Ode to Swingball

0
Filed under Everything Else

On a lighter note, I’ve enjoyed being a child again these last few days.

Monday saw a group purchase of a swingball set, or as you Americans might call it, tetherball or tether-tennis. It consists of a pole with a helical screw at the top attached to a tennis ball by a piece of string. It’s simple: you hit the ball in one direction with a small plastic racquet ’til it reaches the top (or bottom) of the screw where upon you win the game. All this time, your opponent is trying to get it to the opposite end of the screw by hitting it in the opposite direction.

Simple; but fun, and my first go saw me laughing harder than I had in years. Soon however, this laughter turned to tears as the poorly designed racquets (or maybe they’re designed for 8 year olds!) started blistering and bruising my over-sized hands.

Maybe the breaking of the ’string of destiny’ (the string connecting the ball and the pole) was a blessing in disguise as now there will be no more blisters, bruising, or close encounters with flying racquets! I just hope my hand heals before the new string and ball we’re ordering from eBay arrives!

In the meantime, I recommend you all head out and find a childhood game you loved to play. Laugh, play and be merry: being a child again is more fun than you think.

Ode to Swingball - A Haiku

You give us much fun:
Tangled wires and flying bats.
Oh, my blistered thumb!