Monthly Archives: August 2006

Are you a cheese? Cynicism and inspiration.

0
Filed under Everything Else

I recently surprised myself when I said the following during a conversation: “Life is too hectic to just sit down and enjoy it.” This stuck in my head as I’m not usually a pessimist and I seldom let things get on top of me: this sentence is riddled with cynicism and doubt.

Later that day I was going through old magazines and spotted an article with the title “21 Ways to an Easy Life” or something similar along those lines. This inspired me and some of the quotes stuck in my mind. Here is a selection:

  • Appreciate what you have: “Think not on what you lack as much as on what you have.” – Greek proverb
  • Remember to rest: “Everywhere I have sought rest and not found it, except sitting in a corner by myself with a book.” – Thomas Kempis
  • Be truthful: “The good I stand on is my trust and honesty.” – William Shakespeare
  • Learn to laugh at yourself: “If I could present a gift to the next generation, it would be the ability for each individual to learn to laugh at him or herself.” – Charles Schulz
  • Be kind: “Shall we make a new rule of life from tonight: always to try to be a little kinder than necessary?” – Sir James M Barrie
  • Love people: “I tell you, the more I think, the more I feel that there is nothing more truly artistic than to love people.” – Vincent van Gogh
  • Finish what you’ve started: “Nothing is so fatiguing as the eternal hanging on of an uncompleted task.” – William James
  • Forget what others think: “Reputation is an idle and most false imposition: oft got without merit, and lost without deserving.” – William Shakespeare
  • Start something new: “Age is something that doesn’t matter, unless you are a cheese.” – Billie Burke
  • Create happiness; Get rid of guilt; Love yourself; Cast off outworn beliefs; Stop hurrying; Trust yourself; Nourish your friendships

I was confused by “create happiness”. How does one create happiness? Then I realised: we can’t achieve happiness without the desire to do so in the first place. We must first allow ourselves to be happy before we can become happy.
I also learnt this weekend that a man called George Dawson realised that he was never too old to start something new: at 98 he decided to learn to read and write. Two years later he was a published author with “Life Is So Good”.
I also read a quote, the author forgotten, that was something along the lines of: “When lying on your death bed you won’t remember the cars you’ve owned or the stocks you sold, but you will remember those you’ve loved and those who loved you back.”

Web Two Point Oh

0
Filed under Sci/Tech

Web 2.0 – by now most have heard of it but there are still a lot of people that don’t know what it is! I’m assuming you’re having one of three responses to that previous sentence:

• “Old news… you should have written this 2 years ago when Web 2.0 actually started!”
• “I’m not bothered what Web 2.0 means any more, I just accept it exists and get on with it. You should have written this a year ago when I still cared!”
• “Web 2.0? What’s that?” (Also similar to: “Yeah, I’ve been wondering what that’s all about.”

So, what is Web 2.0? It is, in a nutshell, the ‘second version of the Internet’ – hence the 2.0 prefix. When the phrase was coined a description was not given – examples were:

Ofoto (or TruPrint) is Web 1.0; Flickr is Web 2.0.
• Your web browser’s bookmarks are Web 1.0; del.icio.us is Web 2.0.
• Encarta is Web 1.0; Wikipedia is Web 2.0.

Take a website or web-technology and add things to it to make it user-manageable. The content of the site must be user-generated, networked together and run by those who use it. This blog is Web 2.0: I run it and you can comment on it; I can link to your blog and vice-versa while Technorati even does it for us.

Social networking is the entire idea behind the movement – users are networked together by a common interest and then further linked with those on the other person’s unrelated network – creating a web of connections through deep-linking. It’s ingenious and many believe it to be the future of the Internet – a way to keep it alive and constantly developing. A website will never become stagnant if it has users: an Internet evolution… survival of the fittest.

One thing I love about Web 2.0 though is the naming conventions used for the websites. Have some examples:

Flickr (remove the last vowel)
Digg (double instance of the final consonant, or just doubling up any letter)
Vimeo (replace a consonant somewhere to make your word contain ‘me’)
Del.icio.us (abuse of domain names to create words)

Why not combine more than one of the above for a truly Web 2.0 experience? Zooomr did. So when you’re thinking of a catchy name for your Web 2.0 start-up you need to think short, memorable, made-up and hence: unique. Unique is the most important one here – every single reference to Eatr (your user-maintained restaurant guide) should be about your website. Do a Google search and gloat to all your friends that all 200,000 results are about you! You’ll be bought out by IBM for millions in no time. Honest.

Rob Manuel suggests that possible future trends of Web 2.0 naming conventions could be:

• Ck = q (Fliqr, Fuqr, NiceWeatherForDuqs)
• e = 3
• ReallyReallyLongNamesThatBuckTheTrend

I’m not sure, but what I am sure about is that I want to get in on this trend before it’s too late and get a 2.0 address for my website. Llooyd? Morgn? LloydMorgansBlogIsPointlessYetSometimesQuiteInteresting.com? Sh.it? We shall see.

Have you got any good suggestions I could steal and make millions from? I like my Eatr example, and it could be changed to Meatr to be an anti-vegetarian community website (Meatr - The Meat-Eater Community)!

There are some pretty cool naming systems around too. Carl Tashian’s LokoBot will come up with some names and mission statements and then Rob Manuel’s Namr will twist the name around a bit to give you a true Web 2.0 name.

Then again, is Web 2.0 the name given to the new wave of buzz-words being used? I would like to think so. That would be more fun.

365 Anonymous Favours

0
Filed under Everything Else

This morning I decided to have a browse over my 101 Things list: a collection of things that I would like to do at some point in my life - some important, some not so. I had a look at this list today because I realised that it has been a long time - a very long time - since I’ve done anything on the list.

There is one that I haven’t even started to complete and it struck me as quite strange that this is the case. It may even strike you as quite strange that it is even on the list. In the ‘Misc’ section, I have stated that I would like to do 365 anonymous favours… that’s one favour, done anonymously, for every day of the year.

I decided to do this when a few years back I read that humans are incapable of genuine charity. Now I cannot remember if I read this in a philosophy book, a journal or even just heard it in a passing conversation, but it definitely stuck in my head for a long time. Individualism, it seemed, was what humans strived for.

The argument that was put across was that all humans do all deeds for selfish reasons. Toys are bought for children to ‘shut them up’, favours are done so that one can be returned, charity donations and volunteer work is done in order to reap praise, admiration and gratitude of our peers and some even go as far as to say giving ones life for a loved one or a country is selfish as we know we shall be remembered long after we have died for the most ‘noble’ of deeds. It is also argued that we do this (sacrifice our life for another) in order to advance our genes – by sacrificing our own life for our children and extended family we are ensuring that our genes survive longer. We could also do this in a Biblical sense, saying that we do this so that we get an ‘easy’ pass into heaven.

I didn’t like to believe this, as I have always believed that, as many religions teach, altruism is a very important moral value, innate to human beings. This is why I decided to do 365 anonymous favours. I believed that if I did these favours, and nobody ever found out they were done by me, I would have no personal gain from doing them and thus not be selfish. In over a year since I wrote the list, I have done 0 of the 365 favours.

Is this because I know that I would gain no personal enjoyment from doing them and as such do not bother or is it that subconsciously I want people to know when I do a good deed so that I can get praised for doing so? I hope not, and plan on doing one of these soon enough.

I’m starting to think that if I now do an anonymous favour, will I get a bit of self-satisfaction from completing it? Will I be happy that I’ve now crossed off one of the favours and now only have 364 to go? Or will helping someone anonymously actually bring me pleasure, and will I prove the theory that we are all, deep down, selfish? If I do succeed, would proving that we are all altruistic rather than selfish be an achievement that would make me happy or proud and thus, in itself, proving the opposite?

Steve Kanga’s Liberalism FAQ has a great article on this entitled Spectrum One: Individualism vs. Altruism. I suggest you read it.